特级无码毛片免费视频播放,国产午夜亚洲精品久久,国产午夜精品理论片久久影院,内射巨臀欧美在线视频,精品伊人久久大线蕉色首页,亚洲色偷偷偷综合网,亚洲成在线aⅴ免费视频,亚洲444kkkk在线观看

Unitalen Client ICON Won an Administrative Litigation Concerning Trademark Invalidation Involving Similar Products in Different Groups

February 25, 2021

Case Summary:

ICON is a world-renowned fitness equipment provider, and it owns a popular brand “iFit”, which is mainly used in smart training systems and smart wearable devices that support its fitness products.

“ifitfun”, the disputed trademark in this case, is registered by the third person, Mr. Cao, in Class 28 for "brainpower toys; balls for games; rehabilitation apparatus; beauty ware; pressure ware; body-training apparatus; machines for physical exercise; run-up ware; climber’s harness and plastic racetracks”. ICON company cited its trademarks “iFIT” and “IFIT”, which are registered prior and can be used in Class 28 for the products of “body-training apparatus” and “machines for physical exercises” etc., to apply for invalidation of the disputed trademark. After review, the Trademark Office held that the disputed trademark shall be declared invalid in use on the products that are in the similar groups as those of the cited trademarks, such as "body-building machines; rehabilitation apparatus; pressure ware”, however,the disputed trademark can be maintained in use on the rest of products, such as "smart toys; balls for games; sports equipment; run up ware; climber’s harness and plastic racetrack".

In disagreement with the above decision, ICON entrusted our law firm to file an administrative litigation vs the Trademark Office.

Court Ruling:

After hearing, the Beijing IP Court held that although the products approved for use by the disputed trademark and by the cited trademark are in different groups, they share certain overlap and strong relevance in terms of functional features, sales channels and consumer groups, etc., which constitutes the same or similar products. In addition, the third person’s act of registering the disputed trademark is not of subjectively goodwill, considering the publicity of the plaintiff and its products, and the distinctiveness of the cited trademark, which is easy for the relevant public to get confused or misidentify the source of the disputed trademark. Therefore, the disputed trademark constitutes similar trademark on the same or similar goods vs the cited trademark, violating Article 30 and Article 31 of the Trademark Law. It shall be declared invalid for use on all products. The decision made by the Trademark office shall be revoked and replaced by a new decision.

Typical Significance:

In trademark right determination review, the "International Classification of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration" and "Similar Goods and Services Classification Table" are usually used as references for judging similar goods or services. However, due to the continuous updating of goods and services, the judgment of similar goods or services will also be adjusted accordingly. In administrative cases involving trademark invalidation, case analysis should be carried out based on specific circumstances. This case combines the characteristics of the product itself, the subjective intention of the registrant of the disputed trademark, the actual use situation and the possibility of confusion and other consideration to provide a comprehensive view for judgment, which has provided a great reference for the handling of future similar cases.

 

Keywords

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品国产免费播| 久久精品熟女人妻一区二区三区| 伊人久久综合无码成人网| 捆绑白丝粉色jk震动捧喷白浆| 四虎永久在线精品免费观看视频 | 国产a三级久久精品| 亚洲制服无码一区二区三区| 亚洲国内精品自在线影院| 免费精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品ⅴ无码大片在线看 | 天天爱天天做天天爽夜夜揉| 亚洲精品久久久一区| 交换交换乱杂烩系列yy| 国产亚洲欧美在线专区| 99久re热视频这只有精品6| 亚洲色大成网站www永久在线观看| 精品无码国产日韩制服丝袜| 色妞www精品免费视频| 久久这里只有是精品23| 欧美韩中文精品有码视频在线| 日本久久久久亚洲中字幕| 国产成人综合久久三区| 五月丁香国产在线视频| 亚洲欧洲无码av一区二区三区| 九个美女露脸撒尿嘘嘘视频| 中文字幕乱码免费专区| 香蕉蕉亚亚洲aav综合| 国产一区二区三区无码免费| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线网站| 国产又爽又黄又刺激的视频| 香蕉eeww99国产精选免费| 99久久亚洲综合精品成人| 久久99精品久久久久久青青| 日韩 亚洲 欧美 国产 精品| 国产午夜亚洲精品区| 欧美人禽杂交狂配免费看| 中文字幕在线不卡一区二区| 性色av一二三天美传媒| 欧美人与动交视频在线观看| 成年女人午夜毛片免费视频| 本道av无码一区二|